Review “Struggles in the Fields” and the research done by Offen (Module 1), Malone (Module 1), and Kang. In 800 to 1,200 words, indicate how you, as an executive of either a non-profit advocating for undocumented workers or an executive of an agricultural conglomerate, would use Offens criteria or Kangs actor-network theory (ANT) to either develop or respond to demands made by undocumented workers for worker’s compensation. Your review should comment on how you would use qualitative and quantitative research as part of a community-based participatory research evaluation of your efforts. The review should include a diagram of your design using the style defined in the Research Designs document, and an identification of the strength of the research based on the Hierarchy of Evidence from the Research Questions document (Module 1). Competencies:
3. Analyze quantitative and qualitative data using biostatistics, informatics, computer-based programming and software, as appropriate.
11. Select methods to evaluate public health programs.
12. Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy-making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence.
14. Advocate for political, social, or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations.
15. Evaluate policies for their impact on public health and health equity. Learning Objectives:
1. Deconstruct how qualitative, quantitative, and community-based participatory research impact occupational health studies and provide evidence for occupational policy.
2. Integrate the hazards of agriculture and social justice into a managerial approach to the topic.
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
Order Over WhatsApp
Place an Order Online